<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wisdom from Peter Drucker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.josephyiptong.com/2007/12/07/wisdom-from-peter-drucker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.josephyiptong.com/2007/12/07/wisdom-from-peter-drucker/</link>
	<description>My existence in the virtual world</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oli</title>
		<link>http://www.josephyiptong.com/2007/12/07/wisdom-from-peter-drucker/#comment-24244</link>
		<dc:creator>Oli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.josephyiptong.com/2007/12/07/wisdom-from-peter-drucker/#comment-24244</guid>
		<description>On the topic of 100% agreement, that reminds me of groupthink: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink


Groupthink is the result of avoidance of conflict to reach a consensus. The classic textbook case of groupthink is the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Everyone who opposed the consensus was shot down and forced to agree to the common idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the topic of 100% agreement, that reminds me of groupthink: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/en.wikipedia.org');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink</a></p>
<p>Groupthink is the result of avoidance of conflict to reach a consensus. The classic textbook case of groupthink is the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Everyone who opposed the consensus was shot down and forced to agree to the common idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
